|
|
Status
|
Construction scheme
(proposed) |
|
Where
|
To
connect the A1 Newry Bypass directly to
the A2 Warrenpoint Road, around the south
side of the city |
|
Total
Length
|
Approx 1.5 miles /
2.4km depending on route chosen |
|
Dates
|
Included in draft
"Banbridge Newry & Mourne Area Plan
2015" - August 2006
Feasibility study
published - August 2009
Construction unlikely
before 2015
|
|
Cost
|
£100m to
£211m depending on route chosen
(See note
on costs below).
|
|
Photos
|
None as yet - please
contact me if you have any to contribute.
|
|
See
Also
|
General
area map - Google Maps
A1
Newry Bypass scheme - on this site
A2
Warrenpoint Road - on this site
Banbridge
Newry & Mourne Area Plan 2015 -
Planning Service
|
The arterial A1 runs around the western side of
Newry city and, as of 2009, is being upgraded to
dual-carriageway. Another dual-carriageway, the A2
Warrenpoint Road, runs east to Warrenpoint harbour
from Newry. However, despite being only a mile
apart, on opposite banks of the river, the only
way to go between them is to drive right into the
centre of the city. Local politicians have long
called for a southern relief road to link them up,
and this proposal was included in the draft
"Banbridge Newry & Mourne Area Plan 2015"
published in August 2006, along with a suggested
route corridor. A feasibility study was published
in August 2009 which found that the road should be
built, but also noted the proposed route was not
an efficient or easy one and suggested three other
routes which were both cheaper and easier to
build. Although the scheme has not yet been given
an official go-ahead, a further consultation and
assessment process is underway (as of September
2009).
Route
No route has yet been chosen. However, the
Feasibility Report published in August 2009
identified four possible route corridors which are
shown shaded on the map below. The first of these,
the blue one, is the original corridor proposed in
the Banbridge, Newry and Mourne Area Plan in 2006.
The other three are the alternatives proposed for
the first time in the 2009 Feasibility Report.
Note that in this map the A1 is erroneously
labelled "M1" and the name "Cloghogue" is placed
incorrectly at the Ellisholding Road junction.
View A1-A2
Newry Southern Relief Road in a larger
map.
The 2009 Feasibility
Report did not carry out an extensive study into
these routes, but did note that the original
"blue" route proposed "includes some
significant challenges, including proximity to
the existing Dromalane Quarry and the provision
of suitable access arrangements onto the A1...".
They proposed three further routes:
- The Greenbank Corridor, shown
in red on the map above, which runs from either
the Ellisholding Road junction on the A1 or
the Cloghogue junction on the A1 and runs north
east to the existing roundabout on the A2 quite
close to the city centre.
- The Low-Medium Level Corridor,
shown in green on the map above, which runs from
Ellisholding Road junction on the A1 south-east
across a low-level bridge to the A2 Warrenpoint
Road.
- The High Level Corridor,
shown in grey on the map above, which is similar
to the Low-Medium Level Corridor except that the
bridge is higher above water level and swings
inland to return to ground level.
All three of these options
would require the addition of south-facing
sliproads at the existing Ellisholding Road grade
separated junction on the A1.
The cost of the scheme
will depend on the option chosen, something which
as of Sep 2009 has not been decided. The
indicative costs of these four options were
reported in 2009 to be:
- 2006 Area Plan Corridor -
£178-£186m
- Greenbank Corridor - £104m-£124m
- Low-Medium Level Corridor -
£100m-£132m
- High Level Corridor - £211m
The cheapest of these is
obviously either the Greenbank or Low-Medium Level
Corridor.
Updates
22 April 2012:
The Minister was asked about progress on this
scheme via three Questions
for Written Answer in the Assembly two weeks
ago. He said that Roads Service are currently "undertaking further
environmental and engineering assessments"
and that this work will be completed in mid/late
2012. He added that this would inform the
selection of the preferred route, but it sounds as
if this could be after the date mentioned. He
confirmed that so far Roads Service have spent
just under £930,000 on planning for this
scheme. However, he also stressed that the scheme
has not, and never has been, given a definite go
ahead, and that therefore there is no timescale
for construction.
26 Sep 2009: The Feasibility
Report into the scheme was published in August
2009, and
a press release issued five days ago. The
report showed significant benefits to proceeding
with the scheme and proposed four alternative
route corridors. The report however recommended
against the route proposed in 2006, for cost and
engineering reasons, instead suggesting three
alternatives as shown on the map above. The cost
estimates vary widely from £100m to
£211m depending on the option chosen. On the
basis of the report the Regional Development
Minister has "asked Roads Service to proceed
with further environmental and engineering
assessments and to engage in a wider
consultation process, considered necessary to
identify a preferred corridor for the Newry
Southern Relief Road." There are still no
firm plans to proceed with the scheme which, if it
does happen, is unlikely to happen in the near
future and perhaps not for ten years. It is also
interesting to note that the feasibility report
comments that constructing this scheme, at least
if the Low-Medium Level Corridor is chosen, could
render the proposed Narrow Water
Bridge project redundant.
23
May 2009: According to the Minister of
Regional Development (during a question
and answer session in Stormont a couple of
weeks ago) the feasibility study into the Newry
Southern Relief Road has now been completed, but
Roads Service want to do additional work
"developing its findings" before releasing it
publicly. He said "The project is important.
Roads Service and the consultants it has engaged
have undertaken significant assessment work."
and "We hope to be in a position to present
the report’s findings soon". The first of
these comments suggests that the feasibility study
was favourable towards the road's construction,
but we shall have to wait and see.
|